Yea, a right wing gun hater. Sure Burt, sure.
by The Skipp » Mon, 06 Apr 1998 05:00:00
Yea, a right wing gun hater. Sure Burt, sure.
by Alain Matthe » Wed, 08 Apr 1998 04:00:00
> Mr. Stafford, I respect your position as President of the ARRL but frankly
> based on what is written below, cut the crap. I have never been involved in
> any VE session in which there was any question of "irregularity." I have
> already sent my letter to several newspapers (and a few have said they will
> or have published) but many more will follow. If I am reinstated, I will
> stop.
> Burt Fisher
> > Dear Mr. Fisher,
> > Whenever there is an irregularity in an ARRL-VEC test session, we are
> > REQUIRED by our agreement with the FCC to suspend the VE credentials of
> all
> > ARRL VEs involved in that session. We have no discretion along those
> > lines. When the FCC completes any investigation into the matter and
> > informs us that they are satisfied that none of the ARRL VEs were
> > responsible for the irregularity, then we will consider reinstatement. No
> > reinstatement of any ARRL VEs will occur until the FCC completes an
> > investigation into the matter, if they chose to investigate. The
> > investigation is at their option and it is the responsibility of the FCC
> to
> > do, not the ARRL.
> > Rod Stafforddfsgfdgfdfg
by M Johnso » Wed, 08 Apr 1998 04:00:00
You see my friend. If I see your letter published it will give me the
opportunity to contact the editorial staff at the paper and meet with them.
(been there and done that before). At this meeting I will show them some of
the wonderful posts that you have placed in the news groups which will pretty
much show you as the nut case you are.
At the same time I will bring material to show them them the public service
side of amateur radio. I will also show them examples of how amateur radio is
an organization of international good. I will show them with examples of how
amateur radio is a very positive influence on young people. More then
likely, this will result in at least a guest editorial and probably a nice
story in the community or features section.
The net results will be an increased understanding of the positive side of
amateur radio and will more than likely bring some new new hams into the
ranks.
Again, thank you for providing a way for us to get some great promotions of
the hobby you so dearly like.
Anyway, tnx fer the fb qso.
73
Mark
AB0HJ
NOTE: rec.radio.amateur.dx removed from reply due to being off topic.
by Cutie B » Fri, 10 Apr 1998 04:00:00
______________________________________________________________________
Indicatif d'appel de radioamateur: VA2QRU & VE7JPN
Montral, Qubec, Canada
URL : http://www.radiotelephone.net (Universel)
http://www.radiotelephone.net/amateur/ (Radio)
http://www.geocities.com/~masataka/mcgill.htm (Universit McGill)
Visit this excellent site
why code has no importance to the amateur radio today:
http://www.nocode.org
License Suggestion: http://www.radiotelephone.net/no-code/
______________________________________________________________________
***Enlevez l' " .ham " pour rpondre.***
***Please remove "ham" to reply.***
ATTENTION: Je n'achterai pas ou rponse aucun produit des CS non sollicits!!
by M Johnso » Fri, 10 Apr 1998 04:00:00
> Do it. They will see that you have fabricated those posts.
> Anything I say about ham radio is supported by many lay people who listen to
> it for 15 minutes.
Well I guess you could say that my first public service work in ham radioQuote:> What so called public service have YOU ever performed?
I have to admit I did not do much on hf for several years because of lack of
gear and time to put up a station. But I got a new hf rig about 6 months ago
and am now back on hf with portable and emergency power capability and have
started checking back into several hf traffic nets.
Can't wait for field day!!!!!!
Uhhhhh, Haven't spent much time on hf have you Burt? There are still a lotQuote:> As far as international good will, hams are ugly Americams, stomping over
> lower power stations.
Well Burt old buddy, I was at a VE exam a few weeks back and a good portion ofQuote:> That is total BS. There are few young people who care the least
> about the boring world of HAM radio.
You need to relax a little and enjoy life Burt. Please tell us how I am lyingQuote:> > Anyway, tnx fer the fb qso.
> You live for the cliche. And you LIE.
But anyway, tnx agn fer the fb qso and c u ltr........
73
Mark
AB0HJ
by Tom Jeffers » Tue, 14 Apr 1998 04:00:00
The scary part is if the (arguably) most powerful man in the worldQuote:>Its sad, but the news media and the population in general simply do not
>care about ham radio. To them the hobby is populated by a bunch of weird
>geeks. I doubt any newpaper would care one way or the other. Now its a
>different story if you interned for the President, running your tongue
>along his huge shaft. Sucking wildly, you exclaim, OH my God, I'm
>interned!!!!
>Oh my God Oh my God Oh my God our escapades were recorded by a weird ham
>geek on one of those threatening ham radio scanner receiver which they all
>use to spy on neighbors. Oh my God
Tom Jefferson
>:Mr. Stafford, I respect your position as President of the ARRL but frankly
>:based on what is written below, cut the crap. I have never been involved in
>:any VE session in which there was any question of "irregularity." I have
>:already sent my letter to several newspapers (and a few have said they will
>:or have published) but many more will follow. If I am reinstated, I will
>:stop.
>:Burt Fisher
>:
>:
>:>
>:> Dear Mr. Fisher,
>:>
>:> Whenever there is an irregularity in an ARRL-VEC test session, we are
>:> REQUIRED by our agreement with the FCC to suspend the VE credentials of
>:all
>:> ARRL VEs involved in that session. We have no discretion along those
>:> lines. When the FCC completes any investigation into the matter and
>:> informs us that they are satisfied that none of the ARRL VEs were
>:> responsible for the irregularity, then we will consider reinstatement. No
>:> reinstatement of any ARRL VEs will occur until the FCC completes an
>:> investigation into the matter, if they chose to investigate. The
>:> investigation is at their option and it is the responsibility of the FCC
>:to
>:> do, not the ARRL.
>:>
>:> Rod Stafford