President Stafford's response to Burt K1OIK

President Stafford's response to Burt K1OIK

Post by Ken Kuzens » Sun, 05 Apr 1998 04:00:00


: >based on what is written below, cut the crap. I have never been involved in
: >any VE session in which there was any question of "irregularity." I have
: >already sent my letter to several newspapers (and a few have said they will

: Isn't that called extortion, Burt?

Do you imagine ANYONE who knows Burt takes him seriously?

The newspapers probably gave him the same favorable response
they do to people who call to report alien invasions.  :-)

All it would take is a Dejanews search of Burt's postings,
or talking to a few hams, even going back to Fidonet days,
who know about him.  <snicker>

 _______________________________________________


 _______________________________________________
All disclaimers apply; this is just MHO, not Duke's

 
 
 

President Stafford's response to Burt K1OIK

Post by Steve (KF2TI - Landing, » Sun, 05 Apr 1998 04:00:00





> > Make sure you include Mr. Stafford's informative letter when you contact
> > the the various newspapers, Burt.

> > Jeff KH2PZ
> > (.dx dropped from fol-ups)

> Why? His letter was merely a statement of UNRELATED fact.
> Like if I said *** is bad in a reply to you.

To put it mildly, Fisher's full of shit.  Interesting to note that all
past correspondence has been on official ARRL stationary and now he gets
one via e-mail, plus the fact the all ARRL correspondence via e-mail is
done via their organizational address and not personal, leads once again
that Fisher is a bullshit artist of the worst kind.  He can't perpetrate
a hoax with an realism.  

It is interesting to note that not one of his fellow "VE's" has come to
his defense.  Obviously action speak louder than words.  And all this
effort for maintaining status in something that Fishers despises so much.  
Interesting that as much as he hates Amateur Radio, he so vehement in his
efforts to be associated with an aspect of it.  Bullshit, pure and simple
and Fisher is full.

Loser, they name is Burt Fisher, or Drew, or Spew, or Jamtheham, Cutie
Boy, Lennie Anderson, etc, etc, yada yada yada

--
Steve KF2TI

http://www.redwaveradio.com/

Bring out your Dead <clang>
Bring out your dead <clang>
I'm not dead yet.  I'm feeling MUCH better

 
 
 

President Stafford's response to Burt K1OIK

Post by Steve (KF2TI - Landing, » Sun, 05 Apr 1998 04:00:00


Quote:> Did Mr. Fisher receive any correspondance from the FCC?  In it's statement to Mr.
> Fisher that his VE credentials were suspended, did the ARRL forward said FCC
> correspondance to him?  Although I am not on his defense team shouldn't EVERYONE
> deserves to hear it from the horse's mouth?  Yes, the ARRL is the VE Coordinator and
> I am not made privy to the whole story, but there seems to be some questions
> remaining...namely the WHY of it...I mean...where is the evidence?  Shouldn't Burt
> be told the whole story?  He may be a blight to amateur radio within the newsgroups
> (and elsewhere for that matter) but doesn't he have rights?  What if this was one of
> us?  It could just have well as been...

> 73,

> Jim Martin, WK1V

First realize that the Stafford letter is from the delusionary mind of
Fisher.  It doesn't exist except in his tiny little mind.  The reasoning
is plain and simple.  When this bullshit first went a round 10 months
ago, Fisher, by his own admission, admitted to meeting the minimum
requirements concerning administering tests  Nothing more, nothing less,
despite what the little madman would have you believe.  There was no
minority discrimination as he states.  He failed to meet a requirement as
was let go.  Funny, I'd bet Fisher wouldn't pass any of his students if
they failed to go to classes for a year, yet he expects the his failure
to meet that requirement should be waived...BAHHHHH  Fisher got what he
deserves...Ain't payback a ***
--
 
 
 

President Stafford's response to Burt K1OIK

Post by Jeffrey Herm » Sun, 05 Apr 1998 04:00:00



>Damn (sic) Jeffy,
>Net cop ,educator, jack booted thug, now lawyer, is there anything you
>can't put on your resume?

I'm no lawyer. That's why I asked Burt whether or not he was committing
extortion:

Quote:>>Isn't that called extortion, Burt?

The question mark is supposed to signal the reader that an interrogative
remark was made.

Quote:>73

Good - you took my advice and dropped the "s" that you used to append
after 73.

Enjoy the weekend,
Jeffy KH2PZ

 
 
 

President Stafford's response to Burt K1OIK

Post by Jeffrey Herm » Mon, 06 Apr 1998 05:00:00



>> Make sure you include Mr. Stafford's informative letter when you contact
>> the the various newspapers, Burt.
>> (.dx dropped from fol-ups)
>Why?

A better question: Why did you re-insert the .dx NG, after I dropped
it from any fol-ups to my post? Can you provide any answer at all?
I've again deleted it from any further fol-ups. Can you resist the
temptation and leave it out?

Quote:>His letter was merely a statement of UNRELATED fact.

So it's a fact that an irregularity occurred while you were proctoring
an exam session? Is that what you're saying? And according his letter,
if an irregularity occurs, then the ARRL must suspend the VE's
credentials. That's the conditional statement from logic, Burt: If A,
then B (or B is a consequence of A, or B follows A). Of course, B can
result from other conditions, but in regard to his letter to you, no
conditions other than A ("an irregularity occurred") were mentioned.

Have you contacted the FCC regarding this issue? If so, what was their
response as to their investigation? If not, why not?

Jeff KH2PZ (again, .dx dropped from header)

 
 
 

President Stafford's response to Burt K1OIK

Post by Jeffrey Herm » Mon, 06 Apr 1998 05:00:00


>I Chalenge him to do something about N1IVP and his wifes' license.

He has more than one wife?   =:o