Did Mr. Fisher receive any correspondance from the FCC? In it's statement to Mr.
Fisher that his VE credentials were suspended, did the ARRL forward said FCC
correspondance to him? Although I am not on his defense team shouldn't EVERYONE
deserves to hear it from the horse's mouth? Yes, the ARRL is the VE Coordinator and
I am not made privy to the whole story, but there seems to be some questions
remaining...namely the WHY of it...I mean...where is the evidence? Shouldn't Burt
be told the whole story? He may be a blight to amateur radio within the newsgroups
(and elsewhere for that matter) but doesn't he have rights? What if this was one of
us? It could just have well as been...
73,
Jim Martin, WK1V
____________________________
> > Reading literally, and without interpretation, the President's message
> >clearly states that irregularities are the issue. That does not, however mean
> >that irregularities were present. It only means that an issue has been made of
> >irregularities. The FCC, therefore will conduct its investigation, and
> >determine whether irregularities in a given session were in fact involved in
> >the session, and conclude accordingly.
> No I think YOU need to read it again Peter.
> Stafford clearly states that IF the FCC investigates the
> "irregularity".
> Then he says the decision to investigate is the FCC's not the ARRL.
> Doesn't sound like ANY investigation is going on to me.
> In light of the total lack of standards inforcement on the bands, do
> you think they even care enough to investigate something like this?
> What it sounds like to me is a description of a Catch 22.
> You are suspended until the investigators make a report, but we don't
> do the investigating and none is taking place, so no report.
> For the record Burt has shown himself to be a blight on Amateur radio
> and I hate to even come close to his defense.
> However, I personally want the faceless bureaucrats at the FCC making
> the decisions about the way things should be.
> I do not want the old boys club at the ARRL making regulatory
> decisions for Amateur radio.
> Though this instance is minor and has no real bearing on you or I
> Peter, rest assured the ARRL sees the light at the end of the tunnel
> and they are ready,willing and salivating at the prospect of the FCC
> getting out of the Amateur radio business so they can step in and fill
> the void.
> Blackballing like this is just a small step in the process and it WILL
> get worse.
> Today it is "Burp" taking a hit, tomorrow it is you or me Peter
> because we don't subscribe to some ARRL dogma
> 73