Returned mail sent to Mr Wah (Bill Cheek's bogus ID)

Returned mail sent to Mr Wah (Bill Cheek's bogus ID)

Post by Bill Che » Sat, 20 Jun 1998 04:00:00
Organization: COMMtronics Engineering & World Scanner Report
Mime-Version: 1.0


> Notice how it went to Mr. Wah, but bounced back from Bill Cheek.

You're a liar, smegma breath.  You sent it TO me
and yes, my system bounced it back to you:
I opened up my Shit List to settle this little bit
of crap.  You're a liar, Smacksie....a stinking
scumbag liar.... You can't play by any semblance
of fairness, truthfulness, or integrity......

You claim you sent an e-mail to the Wah dude that
I bounced back to you.  You lie like a rug.  You
sent that e-mail to ME.  I pulled the header down
from the server and here it is:  Note my annotations
like this:  <--!   You sent it to ME, smegma breath!
And you didn't even get the MESSAGE ID's right.

You may have sent one to Wah, too, but my system
bounced the one you sent to ME.  Look, clingberry:

Received: by for bcheek
 (with Cubic Circle's cucipop (v1.21 1997/08/10) Thu Jun 18 22:54:05 1998)

Received: from ( [])
        by (8.8.7/8.8.8) with ESMTP id WAA01077

 by PM03SM.PMM.MCI.NET (PMDF V5.1-10 #27035)

 19 Jun 1998 05:53:00 +0000 (GMT)
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 1998 22:53:50 -0700

Subject: Re: Bill Cheek causing trouble round #27

Organization: http:\\
MIME-version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.04Gold (Win95; I; 16bit)
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit

Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

Content-Length: 5



You may well have sent an e-mail to Wah, but your
"test" came to MY server....addressed to ME, you
lying sack of snake dung.  And since MY server has
been instructed to return mail from YOU, it did
exactly what it was told.  

Next time, send your tests to Wah and *not* me, and
see what happens, you friggin hermaphroditic idiot.

You're barking up the wrong tree, Smeggie.
Now BACK ON my Twit List you go......adios snotwad.
Friggin loser.........


> > Weird!  Very strange. Especially since the posting
> > hosts and IP addresses differ radically.  Not to
> > mention the paths.  Oh, and let's see, also the
> > newsreader, the MIME, and other salient points
> > of the header.

> Yea, but Bill, I sent Mr. WAH some e-mail & it bounced back
> from YOU!!!!

> That sorta proves the point that YOU were forging & that
> YOU are a liar!

> See below!

> This is what I send:

>   X-Mozilla-Status:   0001

>               Date:   Thu, 18 Jun 1998 18:37:29 -0700

>       Organization:   http:\\
>           X-Mailer:   Mozilla 3.04Gold (Win95; I; 16bit)
>       MIME-Version:   1.0

>            Subject:   Re: mackey troubles

>       Content-Type:   text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Transfer-Encoding:  7bit

> test

> This is what bounced back!:

> Received:  from ( [])
> by (8.8.7/8.7.3) with ESMTP id WAA12349 for

> Received:  from dr ( []) by
> (8.8.7/8.8.8) with SMTP id WAA14295 for

>                     Subject:  Returned mail: refused by server
>                        Date:  Thu, 18 Jun 1998 22:27:59 -0700
>                  X-Priority:  3 (Normal)
>           X-MSMail-Priority:  Normal
>                    X-Mailer:  Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2173.0
>                  Importance:  Normal
>                   X-MimeOLE:  Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3

>            X-Mozilla-Status:  0001

>              Part 1.2
>               Content-Type:   application/octet-stream
>  Content-Transfer-Encoding:   x-uuencode
>        Content-Disposition:   inline; filename="Returned mail refused by
> server.eml"