Red Wave Radio

>>Checkout http://www.monitor.co.uk/ . I just discovered it, appears to be
>>very new. Well organized, clean, clear photos, graphics, descriptions of
>>why and how-to for modifications to the Radio Shack/Tandy DX-394 General
>>Coverage Communications Receiver. Also has PDFs of manuals and schematic.

>>Along with the 850 plus member user group at
>>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/RADIOSHACKDX394/ and the collection of mods
>>at http://www.mods.dk/view.php?ModelId=573, this new site helps make the
>>DX-394 the most thoroughly hacked, researched and documented radio in the
>>world.

>>Tom

> Mike.

> --
> http://uk.geocities.com/swift240/mikes_page_1.html

> > And also the biggest load of junk on the market
> > Sw

> >>Checkout http://www.monitor.co.uk/ . I just discovered it, appears to be
> >>very new. Well organized, clean, clear photos, graphics, descriptions of
> >>why and how-to for modifications to the Radio Shack/Tandy DX-394 General
> >>Coverage Communications Receiver. Also has PDFs of manuals and
schematic.

> >>Along with the 850 plus member user group at
> >>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/RADIOSHACKDX394/ and the collection of
mods
> >>at http://www.mods.dk/view.php?ModelId=573, this new site helps make the
> >>DX-394 the most thoroughly hacked, researched and documented radio in
the
> >>world.

> >>Tom

>> 5. DXing.com Modern Shortwave Receiver Survey
>> DX-394 is below the DX-302 on the same page. Rating was increased from 1H
>> to 3H about Jan 28/2004.
>> http://www.dxing.com/rx/dx302.htm

> Correction: the rating was increased about Jan 28/2005, not 2004,
> correcting an obvious mistake. This longstanding, unsubstantiated 1H
> rating on DXing.com probably adversely affected the opinions of some
> uninformed individuals.

> Tom

>> 5. DXing.com Modern Shortwave Receiver Survey
>> DX-394 is below the DX-302 on the same page. Rating was increased from 1H
>> to 3H about Jan 28/2004.
>> http://www.dxing.com/rx/dx302.htm

> Correction: the rating was increased about Jan 28/2005, not 2004,
> correcting an obvious mistake. This longstanding, unsubstantiated 1H
> rating on DXing.com probably adversely affected the opinions of some
> uninformed individuals.

> Tom

> Not according to DXing.com who gave it 3: " A rating of 1 to 5 stars for
> the model as a value on the used market.
> HHHHH Excellent HHHH Very Good HHH Good HH Fair H Poor. "

> That Panasonic RF-4900 you sold for 85.90 is rated by the same folks at 2
> (HH) - that's closer to crap, but still 'Fair'. On Mar 30, you posted that
> you wanted to swap it for a DX-394
> http://groups.google.ca/groups?q=rogers.mail%40ntlworld.com&start=10&... .
> Sounds like an upgrade from a 'Fair' to a 'Good' value radio and
> inconsistent with your expressed opinion.

> The Kenwood R-2000 you were selling off in 2003 is rated at 4 (HHHH) by
> DXing.com. That's 1H more than the DX-394 and it sells for 2-3 times the
> price on the used market. Just a little less crappy, was it? ;-)

> 73, Tom