Coax Question??

Coax Question??

Post by Glen » Tue, 19 Oct 1999 04:00:00


> >> Though you are right that rg6U is a 75 ohm, there really isn't such a
thing
> >> as a mismatch on a scanning receiver.

>    Look again at what you wrote above ....

> >> There is no such thing as a 50 ohm match
> >> for receiving. It is rare looking from the receiver end and pointless
to try
> >> and achieve it. Poor advise to say the least.

>    Then look just above at what you wrote in same message ... a

contradiction.

Big one!!! :-)  I thought I had cleared it up. Don't read what I said
understand what I mean. I mispoke myself big time in the first statement. I
really was trying to say it doesn't matter and people don't normally check
the impeadance of a antenna for receiveng.

(snip)

Quote:>   A scanning receiver operates accross a much much broader range and no
antenna
> can possibly offer a good 50 ohm match, a good 75 ohm match , or whatever
> accross this entire range.  This means whether you're using 50 ohm or 70
ohm
> coax doesn't really matter in the broad sense because both are going to
have
> mismatches from optimum impedance most of the time.

Yeah, that's what i was trying to say! :-)

Glenn

 
 
 

Coax Question??

Post by E » Wed, 20 Oct 1999 04:00:00


Quote:>> Though you are right that rg6U is a 75 ohm, there really isn't such a thing
>> as a mismatch on a scanning receiver.

   Look again at what you wrote above ....

Quote:>> There is no such thing as a 50 ohm match
>> for receiving. It is rare looking from the receiver end and pointless to try
>> and achieve it. Poor advise to say the least.

   Then look just above at what you wrote in same message ... a contradiction.

   You guys are kinda comparing apples and oranges ... or maybe walnuts and
almonds in this case.   Yes there are mismatches when you move off the optimum
frequency of the antenna.  In the case of transmitters,  one generally finds
them operating on one or perhaps more frequencies in general proximity to the
resonant antenna in a 50 ohm match.  In worst case, there might be a broadband
Tx operating in an entire band, such as 150 - 174 MHz into a broadband antenna
with a close match accross this range around 50 ohms.

  A scanning receiver operates accross a much much broader range and no antenna
can possibly offer a good 50 ohm match, a good 75 ohm match , or whatever
accross this entire range.  This means whether you're using 50 ohm or 70 ohm
coax doesn't really matter in the broad sense because both are going to have
mismatches from optimum impedance most of the time.

  Ed  WB6SAT

 
 
 

Coax Question??

Post by M a c a r o o » Wed, 20 Oct 1999 04:00:00



>> Isn't this typical of John Mackey. Will your lies and deceptions ever end
>> Mackey. God you must be the sickest puppy in the world. You choice of coax
>> shows your total lack of scanning receiver knowledge which proves you merely

>The words you use above are only true about YOURSELF!!!

I have never EVER dealt with anyone as ignorant and blind as you, loony.  You
just don't get it, do you?

Never have, never will.

Quote:>> NOBODY in his right mind would follow your stupid
>> recommendation.

>You are WRONG, as usual.  Please see the attached post below.

Once again, irrelevant drivel supplied by you.  That post had nothing to do
with anything.
 
 
 

Coax Question??

Post by M a c a r o o » Thu, 21 Oct 1999 04:00:00


Quote:>Notice how Glenn Hansen tries to cover up for his lack of knowledge

Notice how you described yourself perfectly.  You do this on a daily basis,
you moron.

Post on topic or SHUT UP, FOOL!!!!  Nobody wants to listen to your drivel.

 
 
 

Coax Question??

Post by Glen » Tue, 26 Oct 1999 04:00:00

Thanks Ed, just ignore him. We all were doing just fine. Thnaks for clearing
it up.


> >Notice how Glenn Hansen tries to cover up for his lack of knowledge
> >(after being PUBLICALLY corrected) by his statement below.

> >> Yeah, that's what i was trying to say! :-)

>   Well, it WAS what he was trying to say.  I just tried to say it a bit
more
> clearly than he did.

>   Ed