Wouff Hong for antenna newsgroup (filters)

Wouff Hong for antenna newsgroup (filters)

Post by Lloyd Wisema » Sun, 19 Nov 2006 10:20:57



Quote:

>> Works as good as a Wouff Hong.

> I should have said "Works ALMOST as well as a Wouff Hong."
> Because a real Wouff Hong, properly administered, would eliminate not
> only the QRM but the QRM'er - a beautiful thing.

> Rick  K2XT

Get used to the QRM, because after CW is eliminated you're going to wish
your rig did come with Rettysnitch and wouff hong filters...

But I forget, due to the lack of support for good tests a lot of you
people must like hearing Lids.

SC

 
 
 

Wouff Hong for antenna newsgroup (filters)

Post by olekinghole900 » Tue, 21 Nov 2006 05:31:00





> >> Works as good as a Wouff Hong.

> > I should have said "Works ALMOST as well as a Wouff Hong."
> > Because a real Wouff Hong, properly administered, would eliminate not
> > only the QRM but the QRM'er - a beautiful thing.

> > Rick  K2XT

> Get used to the QRM, because after CW is eliminated you're going to wish
> your rig did come with Rettysnitch and wouff hong filters...

> But I forget, due to the lack of support for good tests a lot of you
> people must like hearing Lids.

> SC

Wouff Hong ???
Rettysnitch  ???
WTF are we in the 19th Century here???
Baaaaaaaaa hahahahhahahahahhahaha!!!!!!!

Jeezus H Christmas on a rocket powered sled at the Nevada test site
will you OBSOLETE hams PLEASE join the 21st century.

I mean consider that the terms Wouff Hong and Rettysnitch
DO NOT even appear ANYPLACE on or within Wikipedia!

That alone should tell you something!  (..of course now you
can be some crusty old fart, cloistered ham radio nerd or
some *** who took the "Bash Book" route to get his ham
license will now dash up and create an entry in Wikipaeda
just to inflate his own ego and asscheeks and claim he did
something.....go ahead, be my guest! In the meantime I'm
heading back to 20 Meters to have some fun with the contest
freaks. I made up a callsign and semi-rare section and these
CLOWN-testers are beating a path to my speaker to work me
just so they can see their callsign in print in some half-ass
magazine from CT.   How F-N pathetic! ) ---> PFHBLTTT!!!!!!!!

ps: you should have seen how many DX clowntesters I duped
a few weeks ago using a "creative" callsign, section and running
10 watts into the 40M dipole instead of the beam...suckers!

 
 
 

Wouff Hong for antenna newsgroup (filters)

Post by an old fien » Wed, 22 Nov 2006 02:01:21


Quote:> Since I began using Outlook Express as my newsreader I have been able to
> implement subject line filters which are nearly perfect in eliminating the
> QRM.  Every few days I add to this filter as needed.
> If you use Outlook Express and are not familiar with filters you are
> missing out on a real useful feature.
> All you have to do is hit tools/message rules/News.  Then build a new
> filter "where the subject line contains words"  and then put in the words
> that will be used to eliminate the QRM.  Works as good as a Wouff Hong.
> Here's my current list:

> contains 'cw-forever' or 'slow code' or 'democrat' or 'Fcc took' or
> 'rumsfeld' or 'cw' or 'poll' or 'dumber' or 'blog' or 'crapthon' or
> 'crapathon' or 'cattle' or '...' or 'flonking' or 'punce' or 'passed tech'

> Rick  K2XT

with the punce gotcha he wonders why I simple don't bother to ty
 impoving my spelling do u hav anyting cognet two say?

 my blog
 http://www.marksspamblog.blogspot.com/

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

 
 
 

Wouff Hong for antenna newsgroup (filters)

Post by M.. » Wed, 22 Nov 2006 08:50:52



and you keep comtiing it
http://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

 
 
 

Wouff Hong for antenna newsgroup (filters)

Post by Slow Cod » Wed, 22 Nov 2006 09:56:40






>> >> Works as good as a Wouff Hong.

>> > I should have said "Works ALMOST as well as a Wouff Hong."
>> > Because a real Wouff Hong, properly administered, would eliminate not
>> > only the QRM but the QRM'er - a beautiful thing.

>> > Rick  K2XT

>> Get used to the QRM, because after CW is eliminated you're going to
>> wish your rig did come with Rettysnitch and wouff hong filters...

>> But I forget, due to the lack of support for good tests a lot of you
>> people must like hearing Lids.

>> SC

> Wouff Hong ???
> Rettysnitch  ???
> WTF are we in the 19th Century here???
> Baaaaaaaaa hahahahhahahahahhahaha!!!!!!!

> Jeezus H Christmas on a rocket powered sled at the Nevada test site
> will you OBSOLETE hams PLEASE join the 21st century.

> I mean consider that the terms Wouff Hong and Rettysnitch
> DO NOT even appear ANYPLACE on or within Wikipedia!

> That alone should tell you something!  (..of course now you
> can be some crusty old fart, cloistered ham radio nerd or
> some *** who took the "Bash Book" route to get his ham
> license will now dash up and create an entry in Wikipaeda
> just to inflate his own ego and asscheeks and claim he did
> something.....go ahead, be my guest! In the meantime I'm
> heading back to 20 Meters to have some fun with the contest
> freaks. I made up a callsign and semi-rare section and these
> CLOWN-testers are beating a path to my speaker to work me
> just so they can see their callsign in print in some half-ass
> magazine from CT.   How F-N pathetic! ) ---> PFHBLTTT!!!!!!!!

> ps: you should have seen how many DX clowntesters I duped
> a few weeks ago using a "creative" callsign, section and running
> 10 watts into the 40M dipole instead of the beam...suckers!

You shouldn't do things like that, the FCC will come after you like they
went after old Two-Test.

SC