Red Wave Radio

> > N8KDV,

> > I always look forward to reading your Reception Reports.

> > And, the Reception Reports from many other areas of the country.

> > I hope to look forward to reading WA4009SWL Reception Reports.  

> > After all that was his original focus and contribution to this
> > NewsGroup.  

> > Respect the Message and Honor the Content: Can We All put our
> > 'personalities' aside; When it come to Reception Reports.

> > If It Is Not Off-Topic - Lets Not Go There - Please.  

> You can believe what you want about Mike but he insisted that he did not
> post to the group under other aliases the other week and called me a
> liar for saying as much. This alias has been used about 5 times over the
> last year. Believe his lies and be a chump.

> How do you know he owns the radios he claims that he owns?
> How do you know that those are really his logs?

>How do you know he owns the radios he claims that he owns?
>How do you know that those are really his logs?

> >You can believe what you want about Mike but he insisted that he did not
> >post to the group under other aliases the other week and called me a
> >liar for saying as much. This alias has been used about 5 times over the
> >last year. Believe his lies and be a chump.

> >How do you know he owns the radios he claims that he owns?
> >How do you know that those are really his logs?

> You're the liar. You said you had plonked this address when you had not. It
> simply disturbs you that you were caught lying and now you engage in a vendetta
> to attempt to make yourself appear morally superior. You are a pathetic and
> obviously psychotic individual.

> The other address is used simply for logs and other on-topic posts. But you
> probably wouldn't notice those types of posts since you seem fascinated with
> <PLONK>ing people just to remind them of your righteousness. But in reality,
> you've been proven to even be lying about about your <PLONK>ing.

> Get a life. I knew you'd call my logs lies. How friggin' pathetic can you get?
> Your self-righteousness makes you think you're doing the community a service
> when you call everything I post a lie, but I think everyone can see that you're
> just embarassed that you were caught lying. Gee, I guess even the great
> Telamon's not perfect....

> Nothing else to do in Ventura? Try getting a life.

>In psychology I believe that's called 'projection". You might wish to look
>that up.

> >Typical Bryant. Everyone else is a liar. Everyone else is pathetic. Everyone
> >else
> >is psychotic. "I" knew this, "I" knew that. Everyone else needs to get a
> >life.

> >In psychology I believe that's called 'projection". You might wish to look
> >that up.

> Uh, gee, maybe you should try learning to read, Stevie-poo. I called Telamon,
> not everyone, a pathetic psychotic who needs a life as opposed to keeping old
> vendettas going. But I think the shoe probably is big enough to fit you, too.

> I don't think anyone needs to look up anything to see that you're not normal.

> Thanks for winning me another bet that I couldn't post an on-topic post without
> being harassed and stalked by you two losers.

> Go back to your Drake. It's obviously your ticket to (and only hope for) social
> acceptance.

> > > N8KDV,

> > > I always look forward to reading your Reception Reports.

> > > And, the Reception Reports from many other areas of the country.

> > > I hope to look forward to reading WA4009SWL Reception Reports.  

> > > After all that was his original focus and contribution to this
> > > NewsGroup.  

> > > Respect the Message and Honor the Content: Can We All put our
> > > 'personalities' aside; When it come to Reception Reports.

> > > If It Is Not Off-Topic - Lets Not Go There - Please.  

> > You can believe what you want about Mike but he insisted that he did not
> > post to the group under other aliases the other week and called me a
> > liar for saying as much. This alias has been used about 5 times over the
> > last year. Believe his lies and be a chump.

> > How do you know he owns the radios he claims that he owns?
> > How do you know that those are really his logs?

> TELAMON,

> Why not simply accept the Reception Reports by [WA4009SWL] as
> 'printed' an leave it at that.  After all there are "On Topic".

> >You can believe what you want about Mike but he insisted that he did
> >not post to the group under other aliases the other week and called
> >me a liar for saying as much. This alias has been used about 5 times
> >over the last year. Believe his lies and be a chump.

> >How do you know he owns the radios he claims that he owns? How do
> >you know that those are really his logs?

> You're the liar. You said you had plonked this address when you had
> not. It simply disturbs you that you were caught lying and now you
> engage in a vendetta to attempt to make yourself appear morally
> superior. You are a pathetic and obviously psychotic individual.

> The other address is used simply for logs and other on-topic posts.
> But you probably wouldn't notice those types of posts since you seem
> fascinated with <PLONK>ing people just to remind them of your
> righteousness. But in reality, you've been proven to even be lying
> about about your <PLONK>ing.

> Get a life. I knew you'd call my logs lies. How friggin' pathetic can
> you get? Your self-righteousness makes you think you're doing the
> community a service when you call everything I post a lie, but I
> think everyone can see that you're just embarassed that you were
> caught lying. Gee, I guess even the great Telamon's not perfect....

> Nothing else to do in Ventura? Try getting a life.

> >I have only known one other person that lies as much as you do. That
> >person happened to be a female friend that among other things convinced
> >me that her ex boyfriend had***d her. I could not let that sit and
> >followed up on it only to find that it was not true. Basically she could
> >not handle the fact that she got pregnant and had an ***. It was
> >too much guilt for her to handle so she had to find someone else to
> >blame. After that I did not trust anything she said just on her word and
> >found she lied about many things. Generally I found that she would lie
> >about anything that happened around her that did not fit her worldview.
> >She would just say what she wanted regardless of the reality around her.
> >If she could convince the people around her of the 3special version2 of
> >what happened when they were not present then the 3special version2
> >would become the new reality.

> What "proof" convinced you that you "friend" was wrong? I don't see you
> mentioning anything other than your own conclusionary assessments. If that's
> the case, you treat your friends even worse than you choose to treat your
> enemies, which I am proud to be. You really are showing everyone what a sick
> and twisted person you are. Please keep including these little personal
> anecdotes, they really are a window into your sad soul.

> >Until recently I was puzzled by many of your posts that logically did
> >not make sense. Now I understand that you are constructing your own
> >reality through a series of statements that conform to what you want not
> >what is. With this understanding I have gone back, reread many of your
> >posts, and can now see what transpired.

> Thank god this newsgroup has it's own Joe McCarthy who can see through my
> construction of reality. I guess we can just assume you have no motive to be
> creating your own reality. One woders why you refuse to list your "proof"....

> >You are the most interesting person to read here. I can1t wait to see
> >what you do next.

> Unfortunately, I can't say the same about you. You simply are an internet
> stalker whose every action can be predicted. You must not have ANY life at all
> if we can assume that your primary goal in life is reading my previous posts.
> But, I think you must be lying AGAIN since you never seem capable of listing
> the obvious inconsistencies that you allude to. I think it's just another cheap
> form of harassment that you find necessary since you are such a poor arguer.

> I don't really hate you. Someone as obviously sick as you deserves more pity
> than hate.

>Still projecting...

> >> I don't really hate you. Someone as obviously sick as you deserves more
> >pity
> >> than hate.

> >Still projecting...

> Thanks, Stevaroni, for proving that you aren't smart enough to have a clue what
> psychological "projection" entails. Maybe you should return to giving us
> another thrilling log of the Diego Garcia air tower...

> >> I don't really hate you. Someone as obviously sick as you deserves more
> >pity
> >> than hate.

> >Still projecting...

> Thanks, Stevaroni, for proving that you aren't smart enough to have a clue what
> psychological "projection" entails. Maybe you should return to giving us
> another thrilling log of the Diego Garcia air tower...

> >> I don't really hate you. Someone as obviously sick as you deserves more
> >pity
> >> than hate.

> >Still projecting...

> Thanks, Stevaroni, for proving that you aren't smart enough to have a clue what
> psychological "projection" entails. Maybe you should return to giving us
> another thrilling log of the Diego Garcia air tower...

> >> I don't really hate you. Someone as obviously sick as you deserves more
> >pity
> >> than hate.

> >Still projecting...

> Thanks, Stevaroni, for proving that you aren't smart enough to have a clue what
> psychological "projection" entails. Maybe you should return to giving us
> another thrilling log of the Diego Garcia air tower...