PLEASE don't start new threads when when replying!

PLEASE don't start new threads when when replying!

Post by Al Ardueng » Sun, 20 Feb 2005 22:41:06

Replys should stay within the thread from which they originated.

Thanks all.
--
~/.signature

 
 
 

PLEASE don't start new threads when when replying!

Post by sdanie.. » Sun, 20 Feb 2005 23:28:44



> Replys should stay within the thread from which they originated.

> Thanks all.
> --
> ~/.signature

So, how about those Mets?
 
 
 

PLEASE don't start new threads when when replying!

Post by cuhu.. » Sun, 20 Feb 2005 23:38:06

when when what? Go play with yourself!
cuhulin
 
 
 

PLEASE don't start new threads when when replying!

Post by cuhu.. » Sun, 20 Feb 2005 23:39:12

GO Saints! GO IRA!
cuhulin
 
 
 

PLEASE don't start new threads when when replying!

Post by cuhu.. » Sun, 20 Feb 2005 23:45:16

(OT) can also mean (OT On Topic) I posted something about shortwave
radios here just a short while ago.I think I hear your momy calling you
so your diaper needs changing.
cuhulin
 
 
 

PLEASE don't start new threads when when replying!

Post by cuhu.. » Sun, 20 Feb 2005 23:40:10

How bout that,Sports Fans!?
cuhulin
 
 
 

PLEASE don't start new threads when when replying!

Post by FlowerinThWa.. » Sun, 20 Feb 2005 23:04:53

Heyyyyy ***,you ever hear the cry of the DOO DOO BIRD before?
Ahhhhhhhhhhhhh Shitttttttt!!!!!!!!
cuhulin
 
 
 

PLEASE don't start new threads when when replying!

Post by Honu » Mon, 21 Feb 2005 03:10:07


Quote:> GO Saints! GO IRA!

Rooting for the terrorists, are we?
 
 
 

PLEASE don't start new threads when when replying!

Post by Honu » Mon, 21 Feb 2005 03:24:13


Quote:> Replys should stay within the thread from which they originated.

You must be new to Usenet. When a thread goes off on such a tangent that it
has nothing to do with the original post, the polite thing to do is rename
the thread...preferably with a Was: in front of the old name. That way
people who want to follow the original, on-topic discussion can do so
without wading through all of the other, unrelated crap. Let's say we're
discussing images, and cuhulin chimes in that his dog Blueberry
www.cattledog.com just farted in his open mouth. That leads off to a thread
of discussion that has nothing to do with images, like why is his open mouth
so close to Blueberry's ass in the first place? Anyone who wants to follow
the images conversation has to wade through the farting cattledog replies.
Not good.

So then someone renames the thread "Cuhulin sucks dog farts Was: images".

That's good. See, when the replies aren't to the original thread, they don't
belong in the thread they originated in. ;)

 
 
 

PLEASE don't start new threads when when replying!

Post by diverd4.. » Mon, 21 Feb 2005 03:33:49

Hear ' bout them 200 WMD sitese in Iraq ?

George Bush is gonna invade  ..

Yessiree Bob ! !

 
 
 

PLEASE don't start new threads when when replying!

Post by dxAc » Mon, 21 Feb 2005 03:36:10


> Hear ' bout them 200 WMD sitese in Iraq ?

> George Bush is gonna invade  ..

> Yessiree Bob ! !

When did you get out of therapy? I'm guessing you went there after Kerry lost.

You did disappear for quite a while. Was that the reason?

dxAce
Michigan
USA

 
 
 

PLEASE don't start new threads when when replying!

Post by diverd4.. » Mon, 21 Feb 2005 03:45:24

- Was in Iraq, Lookin fer  them WMD's..

 
 
 

PLEASE don't start new threads when when replying!

Post by cuhu.. » Mon, 21 Feb 2005 03:31:20

I am NOT a terrorist.I root for the Republic of Ireland and Scotland.If
you don't like my opinion,YOU go to HELL!!! YOU canadian TURD!!!!!! GO
IRA,GO!
cuhulin
 
 
 

PLEASE don't start new threads when when replying!

Post by Al Ardueng » Mon, 21 Feb 2005 04:07:03




>> Replys should stay within the thread from which they originated.

> You must be new to Usenet. When a thread goes off on such a tangent that it
> has nothing to do with the original post, the polite thing to do is rename
> the thread...preferably with a Was: in front of the old name. That way
> people who want to follow the original, on-topic discussion can do so
> without wading through all of the other, unrelated crap. Let's say we're
> discussing images, and cuhulin chimes in that his dog Blueberry
> www.cattledog.com just farted in his open mouth. That leads off to a thread
> of discussion that has nothing to do with images, like why is his open mouth
> so close to Blueberry's ass in the first place? Anyone who wants to follow
> the images conversation has to wade through the farting cattledog replies.
> Not good.

> So then someone renames the thread "Cuhulin sucks dog farts Was: images".

> That's good. See, when the replies aren't to the original thread, they don't
> belong in the thread they originated in. ;)

Actually I am not new to usenet.  And I made the invalid assumption that those
reading would know to only create a new thread when the actual subject of the
discussion changed.  Most of the violaters here start a new thread everytime
they reply to a post.  *That* is what I am complaining about.

Thanks.

--
~/.signature

 
 
 

PLEASE don't start new threads when when replying!

Post by dxAc » Mon, 21 Feb 2005 04:41:18


> - Was in Iraq, Lookin fer  them WMD's..

Uh huh... so when did you get out of therapy?

dxAce
Michigan
USA